Objectives: To investigate the impact of operator experience on long term outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients with 334 lesions undergoing elective PCI by three highly experienced (greater than 600 PCI, mean 1100) and three less experienced (fewer than 400 PCI, mean 250) high volume operators at a single tertiary care centre were prospectively studied. Quantitative assessment of the six-month angiography was possible in 273 lesions (82%). Clinical follow-up at 24 months was complete in all patients.
Results: Baseline characteristics of the 159 lesions treated by the highly experienced operators were comparable with the 175 lesions treated by the less experienced operators. Six months following PCI, the minimal lumen diameter at the lesion site was similar for both more experienced and less experienced operators (1.68+/-0.95 mm versus 1.63+/-0.89 mm, P=0.66), as was net lumen gain (0.97+/-1.02 mm versus 0.98+/-0.93 mm, P=0.96) and the rate of restenosis (33% versus 32%, P=0.87). By multivariate analysis, lower operator experience was not a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.25, P=0.81). In addition, 24-month clinical follow-up did not reveal any relevant difference in the combined end point of death, myocardial infarction or clinically driven revascularization between more experienced (29 events in 116 patients) and less experienced operators (35 events in 134 patients; 25% versus 26%, P=0.84).
Conclusions: Less experienced high volume operators seem to achieve similar long term results as more experienced high volume operators.