DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey

I Duvarci; A Varan; H Coşkunol; M A Ersoy

doi:10.1023/a:1024927115449

DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey

J Gambl Stud. 1997 Autumn;13(3):193-206. doi: 10.1023/a:1024927115449.

Authors

I Duvarci¹, A Varan, H Coşkunol, M A Ersoy

Affiliation

¹ Ege University Medical School Psychiatry Department, Izmir, Turkey.

PMID: 12913386
DOI: 10.1023/a:1024927115449

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) in identifying Turkish pathological gamblers. Fifty-nine subjects participated in the study. The subjects were diagnosed as either pathological gamblers or not (comparison group) through the use of the DSM-IV criteria and were given the Turkish version of the SOGS. Four of the ten DSM-IV criteria were found to be problematic in the diagnosis of Turkish pathological gamblers. The data concerning reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the SOGS suggested that the SOGS can be used as a reliable and valid instrument in identifying Turkish pathological gamblers. Most (16 out of 20) of the items of the SOGS appear to work well in discriminating pathological gamblers from the subjects in the comparison group. In the case of the two DSM-IV criteria and the four SOGS items that failed to discriminate, cultural factors seemed to be responsible for the failure.