[Movement and its significance: natural healing physiotherapy and modern pharmacological therapy of osteoporosis in the semantic differential. A quantitative study of a self-help group and two comparison groups]

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapy is a frequently applied concomitant therapy for patients with osteoporosis. Compared to modern pharmacological therapy physiotherapy appears to receive sustained high regard, which should be further examined in view of the attribution pattern of the patients.

Objective: Elements of physiotherapy and Kneipp therapy were quantitatively examined in terms of their semantic content in a three-dimensional space of meaning. This was done in comparison with elements of modern pharmacological therapy. The questions regarding possible patterns of the attributions and a possible hierarchy of the therapy forms were analyzed by a survey of a self-help group for osteoporosis patients and two control groups.

Material and methods: According to the methods of semantic differentials, a self-help group for osteoporosis patients and two control groups (high-school female pupils, breast carcinoma patients) were queried about the individual elements of physiotherapy and modern pharmacological therapy in a polar profile of a questionnaire. The results were arranged onto a numerical matrix and by means of factor analysis, a location in a three-dimensional space of meaning was calculated for each element questioned. For purpose of illustration, the results were transferred to a succession of diagrams so that the assessments for the three axes of meaning became more distinct. The results are discussed on the background of a current neurolinguistic theory of meaning: Sensomotoric experience generates meaning in form of 'primary metaphors'; if reactivated e.g. by physiotherapy, these metaphors can give fundaments for an emergent and salutogenic system of meaning, which helps to reconstruct the patient's 'subjective anatomy' and helps to create new values of living one's life.

Hypotheses: If sensomotoric experience has a central function in generating meaning, the axis of 'motion' and therapies stressing on sensomotoric experience (e.g. exercise group) will show a corresponding profile of evaluation throughout the three groups.

Results: For the axis 'motion' the interventions examined in all three groups show a harmonious profile. The most stable position for all three axes is reflected by 'exercise group', followed by 'whole-body pack'. This stability concerning the axis 'motion' as well as 'exercise group' is discussed in terms of a neurolinguistic theory of meaning, giving sensomotoric experiences the central function for generating meaning.

Conclusions: The results allow conclusions concerning the concrete 'meaning-oriented' combination of physiotherapy with modern pharmacotherapy. Moreover, sensomotoric experiences in physiotherapy are possible reasons for an emergent system of meaning reconstructing the patient's 'subjective anatomy' from basic 'primary metaphors' of bodily experiences up to a whole salutogenetic system of meaning.