Background and objective: Central venous catheter (CVC)-related nosocomial bacteremia is an important problem at the ICU. The possible role of organizational factors, as well as health care workers experience, for developing these infections is not well known. We aimed to identify the possible relationships and differences between the health care process, organizational features of the institutions and the development of CVC-related nosocomial infections. We also compared the results of the Spanish participating hospital with those of an international group of hospitals.
Patients and method: The EPIC study (Evaluation of Processes and Indicators in Infection Control) includes a total of 56 hospitals from different countries. The Hospital Clínic of Barcelona was the only Spanish participant. Each Hospital selects, by means of a random process, 5 ICU patients per month with a recently placed CVC. Data related to the CVC insertion process, follow-up and care of the CVC, time dedication of nursing personnel, days of stay and episodes of CVC-related bacteremia per 1000 patient-days of CVC use were recorded.
Results: A total of 3,298 patients with a CVC were included, and 89 episodes of CVC-related nosocomial bacteremia were identified (3.86 episodes per 1000 CVC-days). The Hospital Clínic included 67 patients with a CVC and identified 1.96 episodes of CVC-related nosocomial bacteremia per 1000 CVC-days. When compared to the international group of hospitals, the Spanish centre used sterile drapes more frequently for fixing the CVC (70% vs. 23%), each Health Care Worker inserted fewer CVC (average over last 6 months: 24 vs 50) and CVC were more frequently inserted by Registered Nurses (48% vs. 4%). The type of CVC more commonly used in Spain was a peripherically-inserted CVC (48% vs. 6%), and the CVC was withdrawn from patients less commonly before discharge from the ICU (16% vs. 43%). Mean total number of hours of nursing dedication was lower in Spain, with lower personnel ratios (number of nurses' hours) per day of stay (12 vs. 15).
Conclusions: The EPIC study provides a valid tool for assessing the results of the process of health care, and for linking the outcomes to this process. The results registered at the Spanish hospital seem to be adequate, yet some differences in the health care process are identified.