[Coronary artery revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass]

Medicina (Kaunas). 2002:38 Suppl 2:139-42.
[Article in Lithuanian]

Abstract

Objective: We sought to report our recent experience with off-pump coronary artery revascularization.

Material and methods: Between July 1998 and July 2002, 80 off-pump beating heart operations were performed at Vilnius University Hospital Heart Surgery Clinic, representing 4.05% of all coronary artery revascularization. This cohort of patients was compared with 241 patients operated on with cardiopulmonary by pass.

Results: Mean age and preoperative risk factors were comparable for the two groups. On average, 2.02+/-0.86 and 4.09+/-1.09 grafts per patient were completed in the beating and cardiopulmonary bypass groups, respectively. Operation time was shorter in the beating heart group (169+/-41 vs. 215+/-59 minutes). Similarly, the need for transfusion was significantly smaller in the beating heart group (beating heart operations, 10%; cardiopulmonary bypass, 28%; p<0.001).

Conclusions: In majority of patients, off-pump coronary artery revascularization is an acceptable alternative to conventional operations with good results.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Cardiopulmonary Bypass*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome