Synthesis and structure of the cluster ion pair [Ru3(CO)9[mu-P(NPri2)2]3][Ru6(CO)15(mu 6-C)[mu-P(NPri2)2]]. A theoretical overview of M3(mu-PR2)3 frameworks

Inorg Chem. 2000 Mar 6;39(5):998-1005. doi: 10.1021/ic990195f.

Abstract

The compound [Ru3(CO)9[mu-P(NPri2)2]3][Ru6(CO)15(mu 6-C)[mu-P(NPri2)2]] (1), obtained via the addition of PCl(NPri2)2 to K2[Ru4(CO)13], crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2l/c with a = 15.537(8) A, b = 36.151(16) A, c = 19.407(5) A, beta = 91.14(2) degrees, Z = 4, and R = 0.069 for 8006 observed reflections. The unit cell is unusual in that it contains both a typical octahedral Ru6 cluster anion (1a), featuring an encapsulated carbide, and a symmetrical phosphido bridge, in addition to a 50-electron trinuclear cluster cation [Ru3(CO)9[mu-P(NPri2)2]3]+ (1c). The latter, with approximate D3h symmetry, exhibits long Ru-Ru distances (> or = 3.15 A). Among the family of clusters with M3(mu-PR2)3 cores and different numbers of both electrons (TEC) and terminal ligands (LxLyLz), 1c is unique in that it is a 333 stereotype with 50 valence electrons. MO calculations permit us to predict the existence of redox congeners of 1c clusters and related 48e Re3 clusters. This work also presents a summary of the relationships between the electronic and the geometric structures for all known M3LxLyLz(mu-PR2)3 species. The basic stereochemical features are influenced by the total-electron count and, hence, by the degree of M-M bonding, as well as the remarkable flexibility of the phosphido bridging ligands. The mu-PR2 ligands need not necessarily lie in the M3 plane, and a wide range of M-P-M angles (as small as 72 degrees or as large as 133 degrees) have been observed.