Purpose: The optimum fractionation schedule for radiotherapy (RT) of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is still debated in the literature. Several reports have compared different fractionation schedules for pain relief. To our knowledge, this retrospective analysis is the first to compare three different schedules for functional outcome.
Methods and materials: For posttreatment functional and ambulatory outcome, three schedules, 30 Gy in 10 fractions (n = 93), 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 80), and 40 Gy in 20 fractions (n = 74), were compared. Motor function was evaluated by a 6-point scale before and at the end of RT and 3, 6, and 12 months later. A multivariate analysis was performed for functional outcome, including fractionation schedule and the three relevant prognostic factors (primary tumor type, time of developing motor deficits before RT, and ambulatory status).
Results: No significant difference was observed for posttreatment motor function or ambulatory rates among the three schedules. According to the multivariate analysis, the radiation schedule had no significant impact on functional outcome (p = 0.223) in contrast to the three prognostic factors (p <0.001, p <0.001, and p = 0.012).
Conclusion: The three fractionation schedules were comparable for functional outcome. The least time-consuming schedule (30 Gy in 10 fractions) should be considered for patients with a markedly reduced life expectancy.