[Laparoscopic biliary surgery]

Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2002 Oct;103(10):737-41.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard treatment for patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease. However, there is a substantial proportion of patients in whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy cannot be successfully performed, and conversion to open surgery is required because of technical difficulties or complications. The incidence of bile duct injury has increased in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Meticulous dissection and intraoperative cholangiography could significantly reduce the rate of that injury. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is still controversial because of surgical difficulty. In our experience, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a beneficial option for patients with acute cholecystitis, and it may even be safe in the acute stage. A better alternative for high-risk early operation and septic cases is percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. The coexistence of gallbladder cancer should be ruled out and preoperative diagnosis should be done carefully. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct (CBD) stones has many advantages. However it has been reported to be demanding and time-consuming to perform, which limits its widespread adoption. In our experience with 258 patients, laparoscopic CBD exploration was feasible for almost all CBD stones. The technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic CBD exploration could be overcome with the development of suitable equipment and increased expertise.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
  • Cholelithiasis / surgery
  • Humans