Evidence-based prevention requires evidence-based performance. The case of screening for congenital heart disease in child health care

Eur J Public Health. 2002 Sep;12(3):198-202. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/12.3.198.

Abstract

Study objective: To illustrate to what extent the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based prevention programme may depend on evidence-based performance, by the example of screening for congenital heart disease in Dutch child health care.

Methods: A patient follow-up study on 290 children with congenital heart disease, of which 83 with significant disorders, diagnosed over two years, and born in the south west of the Netherlands.

Results: Adequate screening for congenital heart disease at Dutch child health centres, compared to inadequate screening, proves to be effective (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.04-0.87). However only 15% of all patients with significant disorders in this study was adequately screened. Total health care costs involved over two years amount to over $3 million. Of these costs, 13% are to be attributed to screening tests; 8% to referrals resulting from screening. The costs for screening and referrals, as they were actually performed, are estimated at about $72.000 per patient benefiting from it. Were all children to be screened adequately this sum would be reduced to about $15.000.

Conclusion: Not only should prevention programmes be evidence-based, but also outcome and quality, monitored by periodically establishing whether they are optimally performed.

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child Health Services / economics*
  • Cost Savings
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Heart Defects, Congenital / diagnosis*
  • Heart Defects, Congenital / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / economics*
  • Netherlands
  • Program Evaluation
  • Referral and Consultation / economics