Health reform is associated with changes in the way the health system works and in the roles of major stakeholders, such as governments, health professionals, and the lay public. This paper reviews the immediate relevance of these social and political elements to health boards, particularly those with lay board members; source documents include peer-reviewed articles, and government documents and news releases in Canada especially. Also presented are the perceptions of 130 regional health board members in British Columbia (BC), Canada, who responded to our 1996 survey questionnaire. Two sets of social and political factors are identified and discussed in this paper. The first set deals with the composition of health board members (qualifications, representation, and selection). Our findings suggest that there is now less attention focusing on the composition of health boards in BC. This may contribute to a re-focusing of attention on the boards' effectiveness in working with stakeholders and in influencing the health system. The other set of social and political factors deals with the relations of health boards with key stakeholder groups. The responses to our questionnaire suggest that the health boards in BC may have had some success in addressing the concerns of various stakeholder groups. However, the respondents also suggested that the stakeholder groups needed to be more understanding and involved in the regionalization (decentralization) process. Health boards that have lay representatives, including regional health authorities in Canada, face similar social and political factors immediate to their operation.