The effect of a polyhexamethylene biguanide mouthrinse compared to an essential oil rinse and a chlorhexidine rinse on bacterial counts and 4-day plaque regrowth

J Clin Periodontol. 2002 May;29(5):392-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290503.x.

Abstract

Objectives: For various clinical applications, polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (PHMB) has been used for many years as an antiseptic in medicine. Recently, a 0.04% PHMB mouthwash was shown to inhibit plaque regrowth and to reduce oral bacterial counts. In this study, a 0.12% PHMB mouthrinse (A) was compared with a negative control placebo rinse (10% ethanol, flavour) (B), a positive control 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse (C), and a commercially available mouthrinse containing essential oils (Listerine) (D).

Materials and methods: The study was a double-blind, randomised 4-replicate 4 x 4 Latin square cross-over design in which plaque regrowth was measured. The in vivo antibacterial effect was assessed by taking bacterial counts from the tooth surface and mucosa 4 h after the first rinse with the preparations on day 1 and prior to the clinical examination on day 5. 16 volunteers participated and, on day 1 of each study period, were rendered plaque-free, ceased toothcleaning, and rinsed 2x daily with the allocated mouthrinse. On day 5, plaque was scored and smears were collected according to the protocol. Washout periods were 9 days. Data were analysed using ANOVA with Bonferroni HSD adjustment for multiple comparisons (significance level alpha=0.05).

Results: The 0.12% PHMB mouthrinse (A) was significantly more effective in inhibiting plaque than the placebo (B) but no significant differences could be observed between A and 0.12% chlorhexidine (C), or between A and Listerine (D). Bacterial count reductions on the tooth surface with PHMB (A) were significantly greater compared to the placebo (B) after 4 h and significantly greater compared to B and D after 5 days. Chlorhexidine (C) was more effective than A after 5 days. On the mucosa, chlorhexidine (C) was significantly more effective in reducing bacterial counts than the other 3 treatments at both time points investigated. PHMB (A) was significantly more effective in reducing bacterial counts than the placebo (B) after 4 h and after 5 days, and than D after 4 h.

Conclusion: Consistent with a previous study, a PHMB mouthrinse was shown to inhibit plaque recolonisation and to reduce oral bacterial counts, indicating that PHMB may find applications in the prevention of plaque-associated diseases.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / therapeutic use*
  • Bacteria / drug effects*
  • Bacteria / growth & development
  • Biguanides / administration & dosage
  • Biguanides / therapeutic use*
  • Chlorhexidine / administration & dosage
  • Chlorhexidine / therapeutic use*
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dental Plaque / microbiology
  • Dental Plaque / prevention & control*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mouth Mucosa / microbiology
  • Mouthwashes / therapeutic use*
  • Normal Distribution
  • Oils, Volatile / administration & dosage
  • Oils, Volatile / therapeutic use*
  • Placebos
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Salicylates / administration & dosage
  • Salicylates / therapeutic use*
  • Statistics as Topic
  • Terpenes / administration & dosage
  • Terpenes / therapeutic use*
  • Tooth / microbiology

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Biguanides
  • Drug Combinations
  • Mouthwashes
  • Oils, Volatile
  • Placebos
  • Salicylates
  • Terpenes
  • polihexanide
  • Listerine
  • Chlorhexidine