Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):572-84. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.572.

Abstract

P. M. Pexman, S. J. Lupker, and D. Jared (2001) reported longer response latencies in lexical decision tasks (LDTs) for homophones (e.g., maid) than for nonhomophones, and attributed this homophone effect to orthographic competition created by feedback activation from phonology. In the current study, two predictions of this feedback account were tested: (a) In LDT, observe homophone effects should be observed but not regularity or homograph effects because most exception words (e.g., pint) and homographs (e.g., wind) have different feedback characteristics than homophones do, and (b) in a phonological LDT ("does it sound like a word?"), regularity and homograph effects should be observed but not homophone effects. Both predictions were confirmed. These results support the claim that feedback activation from phonology plays a significant role in visual word recognition.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Feedback, Psychological / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual / physiology*
  • Phonetics*
  • Reaction Time
  • Recognition, Psychology / physiology*