One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations

Oper Dent. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):112-6.

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / chemistry
  • Color
  • Composite Resins / chemistry*
  • Dental Bonding
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent / classification*
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents / chemistry
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glass Ionomer Cements / chemistry*
  • Humans
  • Matched-Pair Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Resin Cements / chemistry*
  • Resins, Synthetic / chemistry
  • Statistics as Topic
  • Surface Properties
  • Tooth Cervix / pathology
  • Tooth Diseases / therapy
  • Tooth Erosion / therapy

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Materials
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Filtek Z250
  • Fuji II LC cement
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Resin Cements
  • Resins, Synthetic
  • single bond
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate