Objective: Testosterone pellet implantation is a safe, effective and convenient form of depot androgen replacement, with extrusion of pellets following about 10% of procedures the most frequent adverse effect. This study aimed to determine whether extrusion rate could be reduced by antibiotic impregnation of pellets immediately prior to implantation.
Design: Prospective, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study design in a single centre. One hundred and eighty-six androgen-deficient men (400 implantation procedures) were randomised into either a group who had their pellets soaked for approximately 2 min in gentamicin solution prior to implantation, or a control group who had the standard implantation procedure.
Methods: Extrusion, infection and/or bruising were evaluated prospectively by self-report from the participants, and retrospectively at subsequent implantation. Other variables (site, shaving, skin preparation, operator, pellet batch, bruising) were collected at implantation time.
Results: The extrusion rate was 20% lower (odds ratio=0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-1.62) but not statistically different between the two groups (extrusion rate 23/205 (11.2%) for the control group vs 18/195 (9.2%) for the antibiotic-soak group, P=0.42). One operator experienced more total (P=0.0002) and infection-related (P=0.0008) extrusions and marginally more bruising (P=0.06) than other operators. The operator effect did not appear to be explained by differences in experience or implantation style. There was a 4.6-fold excess (95% CI 1.6-18.6) of multiple (19 vs 4 expected) over single (22 vs 10 expected) and no (359 vs 386 expected) extrusions. Extrusion was not related to batch number (P=0.15), location (P=0.15), shaving (P=0.32), old or new site (P=0.59), or the presence of suppuration or not (P=0.42); however, povidone-iodine skin disinfectant had statistically fewer extrusions than mixed alcohol solution.
Conclusions: Antibiotic impregnation prior to implantation does not significantly decrease testosterone pellet extrusion rate. An operator effect, not due to experience or procedural style, an excess of multiple extrusions and disinfectant effects were confirmed. Neither location, nor preparation of the site, nor pellet batch, influences extrusion rate.