Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research

BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):702. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7339.702.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the amount of randomised clinical research on various medical conditions is related to the burden of disease and health needs of the local populations in sub-Saharan Africa.

Design: Construction and analysis of comprehensive database of randomised controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa based on Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and several African databases.

Setting: Sub-Saharan Africa.

Main outcome measures: Number of trials and randomised subjects for each category of disease in the global burden of disease taxonomy; ratios of disability adjusted life years (DALYs) per amount of randomised evidence.

Results: 1179 eligible randomised controlled trials were identified. The number of trials published each year increased over time. Almost half of the trials (n=565) had been done in South Africa. There was relatively good correlation between the estimated burden of disease at year 2000 and the number of trials performed (r=0.53, P=0.024) and the number of participants randomised (r=0.68, P=0.002). However,some conditions-for example, injuries (over 20 000 DALYs per patient ever randomised)-were more neglected than others.

Conclusion: Despite recent improvements, few clinical trials are done in sub-Saharan Africa. Clinical research in this part of the world should focus more evenly on the major contributors to burden of disease.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Africa South of the Sahara
  • Cost of Illness*
  • Developing Countries*
  • Health Services Needs and Demand / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data*