Comparison of the potentiometric, (31)P NMR, and zero-point titration methods of determining ionized magnesium in erythrocytes

Anal Biochem. 2002 Mar 15;302(2):220-3. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5504.

Abstract

A simple and rapid method of determining ionized magnesium in erythrocytes using a potentiometric clinical analyzer, Microlyte 6 (Kone, Finland), was investigated. The erythrocyte cell membranes were destroyed using ultrasound. The results were compared with those obtained with the (31)P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy method and the zero-point titration method using atomic absorption spectrometry. The results obtained from potentiometry and from the other methods did not differ significantly (Student t test, alpha = 0.01). Total magnesium concentration was determined using atomic absorption spectrometry.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cations, Divalent / analysis
  • Erythrocytes / chemistry*
  • Humans
  • Ion-Selective Electrodes
  • Magnesium / analysis*
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy / methods*
  • Phosphorus Isotopes
  • Potentiometry / methods*
  • Titrimetry / methods

Substances

  • Cations, Divalent
  • Phosphorus Isotopes
  • Magnesium