Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique

Dent Mater. 2002 Jan;18(1):36-48. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00018-5.

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the effect of two factors: conditioning methods and light-curing techniques on the marginal adaptation of Dyract AP (Dentsply DeTrey, Germany). The 'pulse activation' curing technique was compared with a conventional light-curing technique for their effectiveness in reducing marginal gaps in restorations that were conditioned with three different protocols.

Materials and methods: Cylindrical cavities, 3mm in diameter, were prepared in extracted human molar teeth. They were restored with Dyract AP using Prime&Bond NT (PBNT; Dentsply DeTrey) as the adhesive. Cavities were etched with: Conditioner36/PBNT (group 1), Non-Rinse Conditioner (NRC)/PBNT (group 2), and PBNT only (group 3). Either conventional or the 'pulse activation' technique was used for light-curing of the material. Epoxy resin replicas were obtained from longitudinal sections of the specimens, and the restoration-tooth interfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Marginal qualities along the resin-dentin interfaces were further measured using image analysis and analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods.

Results: With the conventional curing technique, enamel margin fractures were frequently observed. Marginal gaps were found along the compomer-dentin interfaces irrespective of the conditioning protocol. A significantly lower percentage of gap-containing margins were found in cavities that were conditioned with 36% phosphoric acid. With the 'pulse activation' technique, no marginal gap was found along compomer-dentin interfaces that were etched with either Conditioner36 or NRC. More than 90% of the total margin length were excellent. No cohesive failure of enamel could be observed along cavosurface margins.

Significance: The 'pulse activation' curing technique significantly improves the marginal integrity of Dyract AP when Conditioner36/Prime&Bond NT and NRC/Prime&Bond NT are used as conditioning/bonding systems. The use of Prime&Bond NT without etching is not recommended, as marginal gaps are present irrespective of the curing techniques employed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acid Etching, Dental / methods*
  • Compomers / chemistry*
  • Dental Bonding
  • Dental Cavity Preparation
  • Dental Enamel / ultrastructure
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Dentin / ultrastructure
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents / chemistry
  • Epoxy Resins
  • Humans
  • Light
  • Maleates / chemistry
  • Materials Testing
  • Methacrylates / chemistry
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
  • Molar
  • Phosphoric Acids / chemistry
  • Polymethacrylic Acids / chemistry
  • Replica Techniques
  • Silicates / chemistry
  • Statistics as Topic
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Compomers
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Dyract
  • Epoxy Resins
  • Maleates
  • Methacrylates
  • Phosphoric Acids
  • Polymethacrylic Acids
  • Prime and Bond NT
  • Silicates
  • non-rinse conditioner