A paradigm shift for ethics committees and case consultation: a modest proposal

Fordham Int Law J. 1993 Mar;5(2):83-8.

Abstract

In conclusion, the expert-consultation model of ethics consultation is deeply imbedded in modern health care. The paradigm of consultant as expert rather than as community-enabler shapes the expectations and behaviors of healthcare personnel and institutions. This paradigm has also shaped the early stages of HEC development and ethics case consultation. It is time to shift paradigms and adopt one that derives more from the nature of ethics than from the nature of scientific medicine: the role of HECs should be to enable key professionals to carry out the ethical dimensions of patient care. When the HEC does review cases, it should be with the purpose of improving the institution, not of resolving individual cases. One consequence of this is that there will be more individual case reviews than before, but the function, emphasis, agents and locations will shift substantially. A second consequence is that the HEC will function more as an agent of social change by helping to harness the institution's resources. We judge both of these to be a welcome evolution in healthcare ethics.

MeSH terms

  • Ethical Review
  • Ethics
  • Ethics Committees*
  • Ethics Committees, Clinical*
  • Ethics Consultation*
  • Family
  • Health Personnel
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Interdisciplinary Communication
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Methods
  • Organizational Policy
  • Patient Care
  • Patients