Background: Aminothiols have been implicated in the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis, and reliable methods are needed to determine their concentrations in body fluids. We present a comparison of two analytical methods and focus on the reduction of low-molecular weight and protein-mixed disulfides of homocysteine, cysteine, cysteinyl-glycine, and glutathione.
Methods: The plasma total aminothiol profile was determined by HPLC with fluorescence detection after derivatization with ammonium 7-fluorobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4-sulfonate. Disulfides and protein-bound aminothiols were reduced by either tri-n-butylphosphine (the TBP method) or tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (the TCEP method); the effects of temperature, time of reduction, and concentration of reductants were evaluated.
Results: The intraassay imprecision (CV) was <3% for all aminothiols using both methods. The interassay CVs for total cysteine (tCys), total cysteinyl-glycine (tCys-Gly), and total homocysteine (tHcy) were <4% and <8% for the TCEP and TBP methods, respectively, whereas for total glutathione (tGSH) the interassay CV was >12% for both methods. Deming regression and Bland-Altman difference plots showed positive biases for total aminothiol concentrations determined by the TCEP method relative to the TBP method. The mean proportional biases were 65%, 27%, 6%, and 60% for tCys, tCys-Gly, tHcy, and tGSH, respectively. The calculated concentrations of total aminothiols by the TCEP method were less influenced by changes in temperature and concentration of reducing agent or by calibrator matrix.
Conclusions: The agreement between the TCEP and TBP methods was considerably lower for the determination of tCys, tCys-Gly, and tGSH than for tHcy. For total-aminothiol determination, the TCEP method yields better reproducibility and is more robust than the TBP method.