A clinical evaluation of air-abrasion treatment of questionable carious lesions. A 12-month report

J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jun;132(6):762-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0273.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of treating questionable incipient lesions early with air abrasion, a modality used by many practitioners, has not been adequately demonstrated.

Methods: The authors enrolled 223 teeth, each with a questionable incipient pit-and-fissure carious lesion, from 93 dental patients in a projected five-year randomized clinical trial. Caries was defined as softness, decalcification or cavitation at the base of a pit or fissure or radiographic evidence of caries. Each tooth was randomly assigned to either a treatment group (n = 113 teeth) or a control group (n = 110 teeth) (which was observed but left untreated until the definition of caries was met). Each tooth in the treatment group was air-abraded and restored with a flowable resin-based composite. The authors re-examined teeth in both groups every six months; they evaluated the restorations using a modified set of Ryge criteria and inspected teeth for caries using radiographs, mirrors and standardized explorers.

Results: Of the 113 teeth with questionable incipient carious lesions air-abraded in the treatment group, 50 had caries extending into dentin. After 12 months of clinical service, there were three sealants that exhibited a partial loss of sealant which did not require any re-treatment. Two restorations with penetrating staining were re-treated. In the control group at the end of 12 months, only nine of the 86 recalled teeth were diagnosed with pit-and-fissure caries and were treated with air abrasion and restored with flowable resin-based composite. There was no statistically significant difference between the volume of the treatment and control preparations.

Conclusion: After 12 months of clinical service, two preventive resin-based composite restorations in the treatment group required re-treatment. Fewer teeth than expected in the control group were diagnosed as having caries and were treated.

Clinical implications: The merit of treating questionable incipient pit-and-fissure carious lesions early with air abrasion has not been demonstrated after 12 months in this clinical study.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Air Abrasion, Dental*
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Child
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Bonding
  • Dental Caries / diagnostic imaging
  • Dental Caries / prevention & control
  • Dental Caries / therapy
  • Dental Cavity Lining
  • Dental Cavity Preparation / methods*
  • Dental Enamel / pathology
  • Dental Fissures / diagnostic imaging
  • Dental Fissures / prevention & control
  • Dental Fissures / therapy*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Enamel Microabrasion
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Humans
  • Pit and Fissure Sealants / therapeutic use
  • Radiography
  • Retreatment
  • Statistics as Topic
  • Surface Properties
  • Tooth Demineralization / diagnostic imaging
  • Tooth Demineralization / prevention & control
  • Tooth Demineralization / therapy

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Pit and Fissure Sealants
  • Tetric
  • flowable hybrid composite