Practical aspects of fluorescent staining for proteomic applications

Electrophoresis. 2001 Mar;22(5):919-32. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683()22:5<919::AID-ELPS919>3.0.CO;2-U.

Abstract

SYPRO Orange and SYPRO Ruby staining methods, modified for use with large-format two dimensional (2-D) gels, are compared to the manufacturer's recommended protocols to determine sensitivity and reproducibility of the new methods. This study examines the critical aspects of fixation, washing, and staining to develop an optimized fluorescent staining method. It was determined that careful control of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) levels and pH in the gel was critical for successful staining with SYPRO Orange. Overnight fixation in 40% ethanol/2% acetic acid/0.0005% SDS preserved protein content, eliminated ampholyte-generated staining artifacts, and had no detrimental effects on staining. Three one-hour washes in 2% acetic acid/0.0005% SDS, followed by staining with SYPRO Orange diluted 1:5,000 with washing solution for 3 or more hours, produced high sensitivity, low background images using a STORM 860 laser scanner. Gels viewed two years after staining showed no significant changes with respect to the initial protein patterns, and allowed successful mass spectrometric postgel characterization of protein spots. Protocol changes applied to SYPRO Ruby staining improved the contrast of STORM 860-generated images, but had little impact on staining sensitivity. A comparison of the cost benefits of staining with SYPRO Orange vs. SYPRO Ruby is also discussed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Electrophoresis / methods*
  • Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional / methods
  • Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel / methods
  • Fixatives
  • Fluorescent Dyes*
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Proteins / analysis*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate
  • Staining and Labeling / methods

Substances

  • Fixatives
  • Fluorescent Dyes
  • Proteins
  • Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate