Comparative study of use of Diastat versus standard wall PTFE grafts in upper arm hemodialysis access

Ann Vasc Surg. 2000 Nov;14(6):659-62. doi: 10.1007/s100169910117.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review our experience with using brachioaxillary Diastat vascular grafts (Diastat) compared to standard wall brachioaxillary PTFE grafts (sPTFE) in two similar groups of hemodialysis patients. We conducted a retrospective study comparing complications and graft survival in two similar groups (in terms of age, diabetes mellitus, surgical technique, and previous vascular access) of hemodialysis patients during the period 1994-1997 who had received Diastat (n = 40) or (sPTFE) (n = 40) grafts. We found that the Diastat graft for upper arm hemodialysis access has lower patency and higher complication rates than sPTFE grafts.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arm / blood supply*
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical*
  • Axillary Vein / surgery
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation*
  • Brachial Artery / surgery
  • Female
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular / surgery
  • Graft Survival
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene*
  • Renal Dialysis*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Polytetrafluoroethylene