Evaluation of a method for assessing respiratory mechanics during noninvasive ventilation

Eur Respir J. 2000 Oct;16(4):704-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d23.x.

Abstract

Noninvasive assessment of respiratory resistance (Rrs) and elastance (Ers), which is not easy with conventional methods, could be useful in the optimization of pressure support ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a simple noninvasive method (Delta-inst) of measuring Rrs during nasal pressure support ventilation. Rrs and Ers (Delta-inst) were computed from inspiratory mask pressure, flow and volume recorded during pressure support ventilation. The Delta-inst method was compared with the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in seven patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in eight healthy subjects without and with added resistance (3.1 cmH2O x s x L(-1)). Rrs measured by Delta-inst (5.2+/-1.7, 7.2+/-0.5 and 6.9+/-1.2 cmH2O x s x L(-1)) and by FOT (5.0+/-0.7, 7.6+/-0.9 and 8.1+/-2.7 cmH2O x s x L(-1)) in healthy subjects without and with added resistance and COPD, respectively, were not significantly different (p>0.05). Rrs measured by both techniques showed a significant coefficient of linear correlation (r=0.70 s) (p<0.01). In the COPD patients, the variability of Delta-inst Rrs (30%) was greater than that of FOT Rrs (21%). The agreement between Ers obtained by Delta-inst and by FOT was less than that found for Rrs. Delta-inst is a noninvasive and simple method for reliably assessing resistance. Therefore, it is useful for monitoring airway obstruction and is potentially helpful in adapting the settings for pressure support ventilation in accordance with patient mechanics.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive / physiopathology*
  • Male
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
  • Oscillometry
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration / methods*
  • Respiratory Mechanics / physiology*