Screening of diuretics in urine is feasible through direct injection of the samples into the chromatographic system and isocratic reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) with micellar-organic mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 1-propanol. The surfactant coverage of the chromatographic column makes the addition of organic competing amines less necessary than in conventional aqueous-organic RPLC to achieve well-shaped peaks. Also, the range of elution strengths of micellar mobile phases required to elute mixtures of hydrophobic and hydrophilic diuretics is smaller. This allows the isocratic separation of the diuretics within adequate analysis times. An interpretive methodology is applied to optimise the resolution of a mixture of 15 diuretics of diverse polarity and acid-base behaviour (althiazide, amiloride, bendroflumethiazide, benzthiazide, bumetanide, canrenoic acid, chlorthalidone, ethacrynic acid, furosemide, piretanide, probenecid, torasemide, triamterene, trichloromethiazide and xipamide), using pH and concentrations of surfactant and organic modifier in the mobile phase as separation factors. Twelve diuretics were resolved in 25 min using 0.055 M SDS-6.0% 1-propanol at pH 3.0. The mixture of 15 diuretics was also resolved with two mobile phases showing complementary behaviour: 0.05 M SDS-5.6% 1-propanol at pH 5.4 and 0.11 M SDS-5.4% 1-propanol at pH 4.2. The results were applied to the analysis of urine samples with limits of detection similar to those usually reported for aqueous-organic RPLC, taking into account that the samples were injected without any previous treatment to separate or preconcentrate the analytes.