[Diagnostic evaluation of magnetic resonance urography in urinary tract dilatation and obstruction]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1998 Sep;78(9):670-3.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography (MRU).

Methods: Two hundred and one patients were examined, 92 patients with urinary tract dilatation using a modified, heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo pulse sequence and fat-suppression pulse aid. Postprocedure processing was performed with a maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) algorithm.

Results: In the 92 patients with urinary tract dilatation, 86 had obstructive urinary tract dilatation 6 non-obstructive urinary tract dilatation. In the 86 patients, 14 had ureteral carcinoma, 19 calculus, and 13 benign stricture, 23 congenital ureteral stricture/or with anomalies, 7 ureteral obstructive caused by extrinsic pelvis disease, and 10 bladder carcinoma involved ureter. In the 6 patients, 5 had nervous bladder. MR urography provided the high-resolution image of the urinary tract and determined the presence of obstruction.

Conclusion: MR urography is a reliable noninvasive method for depicting the urinary tract.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Constriction, Pathologic
  • Dilatation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ureter / pathology*
  • Ureteral Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Urologic Diseases / congenital
  • Urologic Diseases / diagnosis*