Corrective photoepilation for improper hairline placement after hair transplantation

Dermatol Surg. 2000 Aug;26(8):790-2; discussion 792. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.00028.x.

Abstract

Background: Noncoherent filtered flashlamp pulsed light has not been used for correction of surgical problems after hair transplantation.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical results of photoepilation in a patient with improper hairline placement after hair transplantation.

Methods: A noncoherent filtered flashlamp pulsed light source was used to photoepilate the misplaced frontal hairline in a 37-year-old Caucasian man, skin phototype IV (Fitzpatrick scale), who suffered from common baldness grade IV (Ebling scale) and had undergone a hair transplant 6 years before. The frontal hairline received three treatment sessions at 2-month intervals with the following treatment parameters: 695 nm cutoff filter, fluence 38 J/cm2, 3.5-msec pulse duration, triple-pulse mode, and 30-msec delay. The gulfs received two treatment sessions with the same protocol.

Results: Final clinical aspect was good and no hair regrowth in the frontal hairline has been observed after 1.5 years of follow-up.

Conclusion: Noncoherent filtered flashlamp pulsed light is a novel therapeutic choice that offers a nonsurgical solution to unnatural hairline after hair transplantation.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Hair Follicle / pathology*
  • Hair Follicle / transplantation*
  • Hair Removal* / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Phototherapy*