Recently, dentin bonding systems have been released separately from the resin composites, because the adhesive systems have been quickly improved. Since the merit of each material should be effectively utilized for each clinical case, the bonding systems and resin composites produced by different manufacturers may be combined according to the clinical purpose. The current restorative resins are basically categorized into two groups according to the main resin monomer, bis-GMA or UDMA resins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interchangeability between the bonding systems and resin composites, which were made by different manufacturers. Two bonding systems and five resin composites based on bis-GMA or UDMA were used in this study. The evaluation was performed by the tensile bond strength, fracture modes, and SEM observation, using the dentin surface of freshly-extracted bovine teeth. The highest bond strength (19.2 MPa) was shown by the combination of LBII sigma and AP-X. The bond strengths of nine other combinations were not statistically different (p > 0.05). There were many cohesive failures in dentin or resin composite, using all combinations. From the results, it was concluded that the interchangeability of the resin composites and bonding systems should be clinically acceptable.