Purpose: For female patients, radiotherapy treatment for Hodgkin's disease invariably results in the irradiation of breast tissue that may lead to radiation induced secondary cancers. The risk for secondary breast cancer is correlated with dose. We have developed a technique in an attempt to increase breast sparing during mantle field irradiation for female patients.
Material and methods: To minimize the irradiated breast volume, a virtual simulation technique making use of a Styrofoam breast immobilization board has been developed whereby the patient lies prone with the breasts positioned in grooves within the board. The breast position is adjusted using Styrofoam wedges, and breast placement is verified using an AP CT-pilot view. A CT scan of the neck and thoracic regions is taken, and the lymph nodes, breast volume and critical structures are outlined. Virtual simulation of the mantle fields (typically AP/PA isocentric beams) is performed, and beam blocks are drawn on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) generated by the virtual simulation package. The shielding is designed to allow adequate margins around the lymph nodes while maximizing shielding of the lung and breast tissues. The para-aortic fields are also easily determined through virtual simulation, where multi-planar reconstructions (MPR) and 3D renderings of the patient's CT data are used to determine the field limits and beam gaps. In addition to allowing for the geometric optimization of the positioning of the breasts under the lung shields, the virtual simulation technique provides the necessary information for a 3D dosimetric analysis, including dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the irradiated breast volume.
Results: The 3D breast sparing technique was qualitatively and quantitatively compared to non-CT-based techniques and other 3D techniques currently available to assess the protection of the breasts. In a preliminary analysis, virtual simulation images (DRRs, 3D rendering and multi-planar reconstruction) demonstrated the advantage of using the breast sparing technique. A further analysis of DVHs showed a reduction of at least 50% in the volume of breast tissue irradiated when using the breast positioning board and virtual simulation as compared to the conventional simulation techniques where a breast immobilization board was not used.
Conclusions: The use of a breast immobilization board and of a virtual simulation technique is recommended for the planning and treatment of female patients with Hodgkin's disease. DVH analysis has shown that this leads to a decrease in the volume of breast irradiated. It is hoped that this approach will reduce the risk of secondary breast malignancies in female patients with Hodgkin's disease.