Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair at caesarean section

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:(2):CD000085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000085.

Abstract

Background: After caesarean delivery of the fetus and placenta, the uterus may be placed outside the mother to facilitate repair of the uterine incision.

Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of exteriorisation of the uterus, compared to the effects of uterine closure within the abdominal cavity.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register.

Selection criteria: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of uterine exteriorisation for repair compared to intra-abdominal repair for pregnant women undergoing elective or emergency caesarean section.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted the data.

Main results: Two trials involving 486 women were included. Neither trial was methodologically strong. Exteriorisation made no significant difference to blood loss. Exteriorisation was associated with fewer post-operative febrile days (fever more than three days, odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.94) and a non-significant trend towards fewer infections. There was also a non-significant trend towards more nausea and vomiting when exteriorisation was done under regional analgesia.

Reviewer's conclusions: There is not enough information to evaluate the routine use of exteriorisation of the uterus for repair of the uterine incision.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Cesarean Section* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Uterus