In view of market-driven health-care policies and the move to greater efficiencies within the health-care system, the cost of nursing care is being increasingly scrutinised. Different overseas practices are commonly cited as justification for changing practices within Australia. This study is based on a review of the literature on intensive care nurse staffing requirements in Australasia; specifically, New South Wales, the United States (US) and, to a lesser extent, Europe. It was found that looking to the US for cost-cutting strategies in intensive care units (ICUs) is based on a false premise: that we are comparing like with like. ICUs in the US have a different historical trajectory and culture, service wider constituencies, have technicians and unregistered personnel providing nursing care and do not provide demonstrably better outcomes or significant cost savings. Research indicates that continuous nursing care by trained professionals provides the best outcomes. If costs must be cut, technology, pharmaceuticals and laboratory tests should be targeted. Further, a greater commitment to the development of a 'progressive patient care' model in hospital planning is required, in order to establish or consolidate an intermediate level of nursing care between the ward and the ICU. Programs aiming to improve and continuously monitor patient care, such as adverse event monitoring, the prevention of unplanned extubation and facilitation of early extubation, should be instituted, as these have been shown to not only reduce ICU costs but also improve patient outcomes.