Comparison of two stent-grafts with different porosity: in vivo studies in a sheep model

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Apr;11(4):493-502. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61384-0.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare two stent-grafts with a polyurethane-carbonate (PUC) polymer lining of different pore size and water permeability in the iliac arteries of sheep.

Materials and methods: Two stent-grafts with an inner PUC-lining of normal and low water permeability (normal, 1,200 mL/min/cm2; low, 280 mL/min/cm2; pressure gradient, 20 mm Hg) were implanted in each of 16 sheep. Hoop strength was two times higher in low-permeable than in normal-permeable stent-grafts. Patency was monitored with use of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) after 1, 3, and 6 months. The sheep were killed after 1 or 6 months. Specimens were studied histologically. IVUS and histologic data were analyzed statistically.

Results: IVUS measurements showed a wider patent lumen of the low- compared to the normal-permeable prostheses at all time points (P < .03). This is likely due to the greater hoop strength of the low-permeable stent-graft. After 1 month, both types of prostheses demonstrated complete transprosthetic tissue penetration and were covered with neointima and endothelium. The neointimal area was greater in low- than in normal-permeable stent-grafts (1 month, P < .005; 6 months, P < .03).

Conclusions: Presumably, the higher permeability of the normal-permeable stent-grafts led to the reduced neointimal area by improving transprosthetic capillary ingrowth and endothelialization.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Angiography
  • Animals
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis*
  • Blood Vessels / pathology
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Male
  • Polymers*
  • Polyurethanes*
  • Porosity
  • Sheep
  • Stents*

Substances

  • Polymers
  • Polyurethanes
  • poly(carbonate urea) urethane