Transplantation versus coronary artery bypass in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction. Surgical outcome and quality of life

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999 Dec;40(6):773-80.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of life, functional status and survival rate of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 20% following coronary bypass (CABG) versus heart transplantation.

Experimental design: comparative study, mean follow-up of 20 months.

Setting: division of cardiac surgery at a McGill University-based hospital in Montreal, Canada.

Patients: the charts of 65 consecutive patients with angiographic LVEF < or = 20% were reviewed. Among these patients, 14/65 were referred for transplantation but instead underwent CABG (Group I) after consultation with the transplant committee. The charts of 14 matched transplant patients (Group II) were reviewed. The SF-36 and Duke's questionnaire forms were mailed to both groups in order to evaluate their quality of life and functional capacity, respectively.

Interventions: comparison between coronary bypass and heart transplantation.

Measures: main outcome measures were mortality, quality of life, and functional capacity.

Results: Results are expressed as mean+/-SEM. The in-hospital mortality rate of CABG among all patients with LVEF < or = 20% was 4.6% (3/65). Among the 14 CABG patients initially referred for transplantation, perioperative mortality was 1/14 (7.1%), same as in the matched transplant group. Three additional group I patients were reported by family to have died of cardiac events at follow-up period. Postoperative death identified at follow-up was assigned the lowest life quality score. The transformed quality of life scores were as follows: physical functioning: I=42.5+/-10.6, II=73.2+/-7.2, p=0.029; physical role: I=35.0+/-13.5, I=61.4+/-13.2, p=0.180; bodily pain: I=54.0+/-14.0, II=69.8+/-8.5, p=0.349; general health: I=34.7+/-9.2, II=84.6+/-5.2, p=0.0003; vitality: I=36.5+/-9.3, II=60.0+/-5.2, p=0.045; social functioning: I=55.0+/-4.0, II=87.5+/-5.1, p=0.050; emotional role: I=36.7+/-15.3, II=87.9+/-6.8, p=0.009; mental health: I=52.8+/-12.4, II=81.5+/-4.2, p=0.054. Duke's activity status index: I=16.8+/-4.2, II=31.8+/-4.2, p=0.021.

Conclusions: Heart transplant is associated with a significantly superior postoperative quality of life and functional capacity than bypass surgery. However, in patients with LVEF < or = 20%, CABG can be performed with an acceptable perioperative mortality of 4.6%-7.1%, similar to the rate for transplantation.

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living / classification
  • Aged
  • Coronary Artery Bypass*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Transplantation*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology*
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Quality of Life*
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / mortality
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / surgery*