Comparison of CEA, MCA, CA 15-3 and CA 27-29 in follow-up and monitoring therapeutic response in breast cancer patients

Anticancer Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4C):3511-5.

Abstract

In order to define the most useful tumor marker panel in breast cancer patients' follow-up and in monitoring treatment response, serological levels of CEA, MCA, Ca 15-3 and Ca 27-29 were evaluated in 220 patients. 180 patients had no evidence of disease (NED) after primary treatment, and 40 had metastases at first diagnosis time; in a 4 years follow-up, 30 of the NED patients relapsed, and were then included in the group of metastatic patients subjected to anticancer treatment. Overall sensitivity in metastatic patients was: CEA 40%, MCA 35%, Ca 15-3 79%, Ca 27-29 70%, with the highest percentages and mean values in liver and bone localizations. Combination of Ca 15-3 and Ca 27-29 improved sensitivity in bone lesion (85% vs 80%), in locoregional relapses only association with CEA increased sensitivity (60% vs 40%). Ca 15-3 and Ca 27-29 values increased on average 3 months before clinical diagnosis. In treated patients there was a better correlation with a clinical course of disease for Ca 15-3 and Ca 27-29 (both 81%) as compared to the other determined markers.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate / blood*
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood*
  • Bone Neoplasms / secondary
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / metabolism
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen / blood*
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • Middle Aged
  • Mucin-1 / blood*
  • Neoplasm Metastasis / diagnosis
  • Recurrence
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • CA 27-29 antigen
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen
  • Mucin-1
  • mucinous carcinoma-associated antigen