Comparison of conventional ribotyping and PCR-RFLP ribotyping for the analysis of endemic strains of Neisseria meningitidis isolated in a local community over 7 years

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Oct 15;179(2):247-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08735.x.

Abstract

Conventional ribotyping was compared with the PCR amplification of the intergenic spacer region between 16S and 23S rRNA genes (PCR-RFLP ribotyping) when applied to the subtyping of sporadic Neisseria meningitidis strains. Thirty isolates out of a total of 36 meningococcal disease cases, reported as having occurred in a particular community over a 7-year endemic period, were analyzed by each of the methods. Only ribotyping with three restriction enzymes (EcoRI, ClaI and XhoI) gave acceptable discriminatory power for short-term epidemiological purposes. We conclude that conventional ribotyping is a suitable method for typing sporadic meningococcal strains and that it cannot be replaced by the more straightforward PCR-RFLP ribotyping method.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bacterial Typing Techniques*
  • Humans
  • Neisseria meningitidis / classification*
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction*
  • Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length*
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 23S / genetics

Substances

  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 23S