Purpose: We evaluated the effects on the costs and quality of care of implementation of 18 clinical pathways for urological operations.
Materials and methods: From April 1997 to March 1998 patients undergoing 1 of 18 urological operations were treated according to clinical pathways. The outcomes in terms of length of hospital stay and admission charges of these patients were compared with those of patients treated between April 1996 and March 1997 before clinical pathways were implemented. We also selected 7 clinically relevant quality indicators to assess the quality of care before and after clinical pathway implementation.
Results: Of the 1,784 patients undergoing urological surgery from April 1997 to March 1998, 1,382 (77.5%) were treated according to 1 of the 18 clinical pathways. Before implementation 1,279 of 1,615 patients (79.2%) underwent these procedures. The length of hospital stay decreased from 5.5 to 4.9 days (p < 0.01) and the average hospital admission charges decreased by 12.9% (p < 0.01) after implementation. Five of the quality indicators, including the rate of surgical complications, were significantly improved after pathway implementation. The hospitalization rate was not affected (1.3 before versus 0.8% after implementation, p = 0.18). Variations from the clinical pathways occurred in 543 cases (39.3%) and affected the length of hospital stay only (11.6%) or the admission charge only (12.9%) more often than both (7.8%, p < 0.01) or neither (7.0%, p < 0.01). The most common variances in these patients were patient related (30.8%).
Conclusions: Implementation of multiple clinical pathways in a urology department can improve urological practice by decreasing the length of hospital stay, admission charges and rate of surgical complications, and by improving the quality of care.