Background: Although it is superior to thrombolysis, primary PTCA does have some limitations, both in hospital (recurrent ischemia and reinfarction due to reocclusion of the infarct-related artery) and at the six-month follow-up (high rate of late restenosis). Coronary stenting is a promising way of solving some of these problems, even if its use in patients with acute myocardial infarction could prove to be controversial because of intracoronary thrombus. In this study, we propose two procedural strategies in the treatment of the infarct-related artery (IRA): the search for optimal angiographic results after PTCA ("stent-like result"--SLR--with residual stenosis < or = 20%--no dissection--TIMI III flow) or intracoronary stenting when SLR was not obtained after a second inflation.
Methods and results: From December 1995 to May 1998, 200 patients with AMI underwent direct PTCA or rescue PTCA because of failed thrombolysis. There were 143 men and 57 women, mean age 65 (range 36-84). Nineteen patients were in cardiogenic shock and 25 were in Killip class > II. Recanalization of the IRA was achieved in 196 patients (98%). In four patients, it was not possible to cross total occlusion with the guide-wire. SLR post-PTCA was achieved in 40 patients (20%). Stents were placed in 147 patients (75%), with "elective" implantation in 73 lesions because of suboptimal results after PTCA in 41, and early loss or coronary dissection with threatening occlusion in 33. In nine patients without SLR, stenting was not performed because of diffuse disease of the IRA. In-hospital complications included ten deaths (8 of 19 patients with cardiogenic shock at admission and 2 with multivessel disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction). None of the patients required emergency coronary bypass for procedural complications. One patient had a subacute thrombosis on the third day after bail-out stent implantation (re-PTCA). Five patients required elective bypass surgery to complete revascularization for multivessel disease with ten days after the surgical procedure. At the six-month follow-up, one patient had died of cardiogenic shock. Eleven (5%) patients with bail-out procedures underwent coronary bypass surgery or PTCA. Thirty-one patients (31/168) had recurrence of ischemia: 15 patients in the stent group, 11 in SLR group and 5 in the non-SLR group. Re-PTCA was performed in 20 patients, CABG in five and medical therapy in six. Other patients were angina-free at follow-up.
Conclusions: Based on our experience, seeking optimal angiographic results with or without (SLR) stent implantation is a safe and effective operative approach to achieve the best procedural and clinical outcome and reduce complications in patients undergoing PTCA for AMI.