Presence of a chronic disease influences patients' lives and reinforces demands to accept and then cope with the illness. In the case of inflammatory bowel disease, quality of life greatly differs through phases of remissions and relapses. Could the quality of life questionnaire tell the difference? In this study we are disclosing possibilities of assessing patients' perspectives by analysing analogue scale statements regarding concerns and worries related to ulcerative colitis. Some two hundred Swedish patients, 3/4 in remission and 1/4 in relapse, filled out a booklet containing 36 statements. To characterise the disease activity, we have used multivariate discrimination. To structure and describe in details paths distinguishing the remission from relapse, we have used an artificial intelligence procedure. Applications of the CART (Classification And Regression Trees) algorithm resulted in a set of classifiers which are, based on the similar subsets of significant variables, i.e. statements. Best reached classification accuracy did not exceed 80% in any case. Other classifiers namely, K-nearest-neighbour (KNN), Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) confirmed that outcome. An expectation that the disease activity should clearly speak throughout the questionnaire held for a certain number of the observations such as pain and suffering, loss of bowel control, dying early, feeling alone, ability to have children, being treated as different and concerns regarding the medication. To highlight the difference of incorrect 20%, K-means clustering was performed. The results settled a basis for a hypothesis that the studied quality of life instrument captures more than the disease activity.