Abstract
Although managed care may be more effective than fee-for-service in containing health care costs in the United States, it is less effective in countries with a national health service. In Hong Kong, costs have been contained despite the fact that 95% of general practitioners still practice on a solo, fee-for-service basis. The author describes in detail how the system of tax-based hospitals guarantees universal access without escalating costs.
MeSH terms
-
Cost Control
-
Delivery of Health Care / economics
-
Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration*
-
Family Practice / economics
-
Fee-for-Service Plans
-
Health Care Reform
-
Hong Kong / epidemiology
-
Hospitals, Public / economics
-
Hospitals, Public / organization & administration*
-
Insurance, Health
-
Managed Care Programs
-
Models, Organizational
-
Private Practice / economics
-
Private Practice / organization & administration*
-
Private Sector
-
Public Health / statistics & numerical data
-
Public Sector
-
Salaries and Fringe Benefits