Detection and characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus in Baltic countries and eastern Poland

PLoS One. 2013 May 1;8(5):e61374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061374. Print 2013.

Abstract

Ticks were collected from the vegetation in the Baltic countries Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and eastern Poland and analyzed for the presence of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) by amplification of the partial E and NS3 genes. In Estonia we found statistically significant differences in the TBEV prevalence between I. persulcatus and I. ricinus ticks (4.23% and 0.42%, respectively). In Latvia, the difference in TBEV prevalence between the two species was not statistically significant (1.02% for I. persulcatus and 1.51% for I. ricinus, respectively). In Lithuania and Poland TBEV was detected in 0.24% and 0.11% of I. ricinus ticks, respectively. Genetic characterization of the partial E and NS3 sequences demonstrated that the TBEV strains belonged to the European subtype in all countries, as well as to the Siberian subtype in Estonia. We also found that in areas where ranges of two tick species overlap, the TBEV subtypes may be detected not only in their natural vector, but also in sympatric tick species.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Arachnid Vectors / virology*
  • Baltic States
  • Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne / genetics*
  • Genes, Insect
  • Humans
  • Ixodes / genetics
  • Ixodes / virology*
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Molecular Typing
  • Phylogeny
  • Poland
  • Prevalence
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA
  • Viral Nonstructural Proteins / genetics

Substances

  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
  • Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the the European Union Grant Goce-2003-010284 EDEN, the Estonian Science Foundation (Grant ETF 8691), Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (project SF0940033s09) and the European Regional Development Fund (Estonian Research Council, programme TerVE, project ZoonRisk 3.2.1002.11-0002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.