Process-Structure-Property Relationship Development in Large-Format Additive Manufacturing: Fiber Alignment and Ultimate Tensile Strength

Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;17(7):1526. doi: 10.3390/ma17071526.

Abstract

Parts made through additive manufacturing (AM) often exhibit mechanical anisotropy due to the time-based deposition of material and processing parameters. In polymer material extrusion (MEX), printed parts have weak points at layer interfaces, perpendicular to the direction of deposition. Poly(lactic acid) with chopped carbon fiber was printed on a large-format pellet printer at various extrusion rates with the same tool pathing to measure the fiber alignment with deposition via two methods and relate it to the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). Within a singular printed bead, an X-ray microscopy (XRM) scan was conducted to produce a reconstruction of the internal microstructure and 3D object data on the length and orientation of fibers. From the scan, discrete images were used in an image analysis technique to determine the fiber alignment to deposition without 3D object data on each fiber's size. Both the object method and the discrete image method showed a negative relationship between the extrusion rate and fiber alignment, with -34.64% and -53.43% alignment per extrusion multiplier, respectively, as the slopes of the linear regression. Tensile testing was conducted to determine the correlation between the fiber alignment and UTS. For all extrusion rates tested, as the extrusion multiplier increased, the percent difference in the UTS decreased, to a minimum of 8.12 ± 14.40%. The use of image analysis for the determination of the fiber alignment provides a possible method for relating the microstructure to the meso-property of AM parts, and the relationship between the microstructure and the properties establishes process-structure-property relationships for large-format AM.

Keywords: X-ray microscopy; additive manufacturing; fiber alignment; material extrusion; microstructure; tensile strength; thermoplastic.

Grants and funding

The use of trade, product, or firm names in this document is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The tests described and the resulting data presented herein, unless otherwise noted, are based on work conducted by the U.S. Army ERDC supported under 511633/BN8 “Autonomous Digital Design and Manufacturing.” Permission was granted by the Director, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory to publish this information. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.