To mitigate microbial activity in swimming pools and to ensure hygienic safety for bathers, pool systems have a recirculating water system ensuring continuous water treatment and disinfection by chlorination. A major drawback associated with the use of chlorine as disinfectant is its potential to react with precursor substances present in pool water to form harmful disinfection byproducts (DBPs). In this study, different combinations of conventional and advanced treatment processes were applied to lower the concentration of DBPs and their precursors in pool water by using a pilot-scale swimming pool model operated under reproducible and fully controlled conditions. The quality of the pool water was determined after stationary concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were reached. The relative removal of DOC (Δc cin-1) across the considered treatment trains ranged between 0.1 ± 2.9% and 7.70 ± 4.5%, where conventional water treatment (coagulation and sand filtration combined with granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration) was revealed to be the most effective. Microbial processes in the deeper, chlorine-free regions of the GAC filter have been found to play an important role in the degradation of organic substances. Almost all treatment combinations were capable of removing trihalomethanes to some degree and trichloramine and dichloroacetonitrile almost completely. However, the results demonstrated that effective removal of DBPs across the treatment train does not necessarily result in low DBP concentrations in the basin of a pool. This raises the importance of the DBP formation potential of the organic precursors, which has been shown to depend strongly on the treatment concept applied. Irrespective of the filtration technique employed, treatment combinations employing UV irradiation as a second treatment step revealed higher concentrations of volatile DBPs in the pool compared to those employing GAC filtration as a second treatment step. In the particular case of trichloramine, results confirm that its removal across the treatment train is not a feasible mitigation strategy because it cannot compensate for the fast formation in the basin.