Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jul;114(1):127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 May 15.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose was to evaluate the perceived spatial and contrast resolution for a wide range of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices.

Study design: A customized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom was developed. Inserts containing a line-pair and rod pattern were used. The phantom was scanned with 13 CBCT devices and 1 multislice CT (MSCT) device using a variety of scanning protocols. The images were presented to 4 observers for scoring.

Results: The observer scores showed excellent agreement. A wide range was seen in image quality between CBCT exposure protocols. Compared with the average CBCT scores, the MSCT protocols scored lower for the line-pair insert but higher for the rod insert.

Conclusions: CBCT devices are generally suitable for the visualization of high-contrast structures. Certain exposure protocols can be used for depicting low-contrast structures or fine details. The user should be able to select appropriate exposure protocols according to varying diagnostic requirements.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / instrumentation*
  • Humans
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed*