Psychological profiles of South African smallholder farmers

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0265634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265634. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The present study examined smallholder farmer profiles based on key psychological variables associated with farm business performance in the South African context. A sample of 471 beef farmers (mean age = 54.15 years; SD = 14.46; men = 76%) and 426 poultry farmers (mean age = 47.28 years; SD = 13.53; women = 54.5%) provided data on a range of measures assessing attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, personality characteristics, present and future time orientation, expected benefits of, and efficacy to perform the farm business tasks, and farm-related concerns. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct profile segments of smallholder beef and poultry farmers, respectively: Fatalists, Traditionalists, and Entrepreneurs. Our results suggested unique combinations of psychological characteristics in a sample of South African smallholder beef and poultry farmers and show a novel way of understanding enablers of, and barriers to, engaging in the farm business.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Attitude*
  • Cattle
  • Farmers* / psychology
  • Farms
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • South Africa

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.19354313

Grants and funding

Initials of the authors who received each award: HMB for the ACIAR project and NBN for the DALRRD funds Grant numbers awarded to each author: ACIAR LPS/2016/276 and no grant number for the DALRRD funds The full name of each funder: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research; South African Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development URL of each funder website: https://www.aciar.gov.au/ and http://www.dalrrd.gov.za/ (ARC is the administrator of DALRRD funds for the poultry recording scheme) Did the sponsors or funders play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript? The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.