Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1984 1
1989 1
1995 1
1996 1
1998 1
2000 1
2001 1
2003 1
2005 1
2006 1
2008 2
2009 1
2011 3
2012 1
2013 3
2014 2
2015 3
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
2022 24
2023 34
2024 15

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

90 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods.
Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC. Revilla-León M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr 18:S0022-3913(24)00204-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.011. Online ahead of print. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 38641478
In the P group, photographs with the reference glasses (Kois Reference Glasses 3.0) were positioned in the mannequin. ...Significant posterior right (P<.001), anterior (P=.005), posterior left (P<.001), and overall (P<.001) truen …
In the P group, photographs with the reference glasses (Kois Reference Glasses 3.0) were positioned in the mannequin. ...Signi …
Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
Lux LH, Thompson GA, Waliszewski KJ, Ziebert GJ. Lux LH, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Jun 5. J Prosthet Dent. 2015. PMID: 25979448
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System (KDFA) is used by clinicians to mount maxillary casts and evaluate and treat patients. ...RESULTS: The KDFA and PMF mounted the maxillary cast in a position that was not statistically different from the skull when …
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System (KDFA) is used by clinicians to mount maxillary casts and evaluate and tr …
Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Revilla-León M, et al. J Dent. 2023 May;132:104478. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104478. Epub 2023 Mar 6. J Dent. 2023. PMID: 36889536
In the control group, casts were mounted on an articulator (Panadent) using a face bow and a CR record captured with the Kois deprogrammer (KD). The casts were digitized by using a scanner (T710) (control files). ...The iTero group obtained the worst precision among the gr …
In the control group, casts were mounted on an articulator (Panadent) using a face bow and a CR record captured with the Kois deprogr …
Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
Sicilia E, Lagreca G, Papaspyridakos P, Finkelman M, Cobo J, Att W, Revilla-León M. Sicilia E, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Feb 22:S0022-3913(23)00060-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.018. Online ahead of print. J Prosthet Dent. 2023. PMID: 36828728 Free article.
For each cast, 3 subgroups were determined based on the soft tissue moulage fabricated for each reference cast exposing 3 mm (P-3 and A-3 subgroups), 5 mm (P-5 and A-5 subgroups), and 7 mm (P-7 and A-7 subgroups) of the implant scan bodies. ...RESULTS: For li …
For each cast, 3 subgroups were determined based on the soft tissue moulage fabricated for each reference cast exposing 3 mm (P-3 and …
Best-Fit Algorithm Influences on Virtual Casts' Alignment Discrepancies.
Revilla-León M, Gohil A, Barmak AB, Zandinejad A, Raigrodski AJ, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J. Revilla-León M, et al. J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(4):331-339. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13537. Epub 2022 Jun 6. J Prosthodont. 2023. PMID: 35524587

RESULTS: Significant RMS error mean value differences were found across the groups (p < 0.001). Tukey test revealed significant RMS error mean value differences between the BF and LBF-3 groups (p = 0.022), BF and LBF-6 groups (p < 0.001), LB-3 and LB-6

…

RESULTS: Significant RMS error mean value differences were found across the groups (p < 0.001). Tukey test revealed significant RM

…
Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Strommer S, Barmak AB, Kois JC. Revilla-León M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr 11:S0022-3913(24)00188-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.003. Online ahead of print. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 38609764
RESULTS: The overall discrepancy measured in the CNV group was 0.620 0.396 mm, while in the Photo group it was 1.282 0.118 mm. Significant trueness differences were found in the midline (P=.037), anterior (P=.050), posterior right (P<.001), posterior left …
RESULTS: The overall discrepancy measured in the CNV group was 0.620 0.396 mm, while in the Photo group it was 1.282 0.118 mm. Significant t …
Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.
Revilla-León M, Gohil A, Barmak AB, Gómez-Polo M, Pérez-Barquero JA, Att W, Kois JC. Revilla-León M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):755-760. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 21. J Prosthet Dent. 2023. PMID: 35210107
RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in the trueness values among all 4 groups (P<.001). Furthermore, significant differences between the linear discrepancy medians between the control and 19-D groups (P<.001), control and 15-D gro …
RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in the trueness values among all 4 groups (P<.001). Furthermore, …
Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans.
Gómez-Polo M, Cascos R, Ortega R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Revilla-León M. Gómez-Polo M, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Jun;34(6):591-601. doi: 10.1111/clr.14069. Epub 2023 Apr 13. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023. PMID: 37052054

Two-way ANOVA and the pairwise comparison Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (alpha = .05). RESULTS: Significant discrepancies in trueness (p < .001), precision (p < .001), scanning time (p < .001), and number of photograms (p < .001

…
Two-way ANOVA and the pairwise comparison Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (alpha = .05). RESULTS: Significant discrepancies in tru …
Conventional and digital complete-arch implant impression techniques: An in vitro study comparing accuracy.
Gómez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Cascos R, Ballesteros J, Barmak AB, Revilla-León M. Gómez-Polo M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec 18:S0022-3913(22)00555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.028. Online ahead of print. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. PMID: 36539313
The CNV subgroup obtained the best linear trueness, while the IOS and CBCT-IOS showed the worst trueness. Group (P<.001) significantly influenced angular trueness. Group (P=.009) and subgroup (P<.001) influenced the linear precision. The P group …
The CNV subgroup obtained the best linear trueness, while the IOS and CBCT-IOS showed the worst trueness. Group (P<.001) significa …
Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. Revilla-León M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jan 20:S0022-3913(22)00795-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.007. Online ahead of print. J Prosthet Dent. 2023. PMID: 36682896
RESULTS: The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship record were significantly affected by the technique used (P<.001). The maxillomandibular relationship trueness values from high to low were iTero (0.14 0.09 mm), followed by the Modjaw (0.20 0.04 …
RESULTS: The trueness and precision of the maxillomandibular relationship record were significantly affected by the technique used (P …
90 results