Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2014 1
2022 1
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

2 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Efficacy of atropine for myopia control in children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Kumari S, Anand R, Tripathi S, Mishra RC, Jha SK. Kumari S, et al. Among authors: anand r. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Nov;11(11):6668-6677. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1339_22. Epub 2022 Dec 16. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022. PMID: 36993096 Free PMC article. Review.
RESULT: Pooled summary effect size, calculated by random effect model, for SE of myopia progression was 1.08 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.31-1.86) which was statistically significant (P-value = 0.006). Pooled summary effect size, calculated by random effect model, …
RESULT: Pooled summary effect size, calculated by random effect model, for SE of myopia progression was 1.08 with 95% confidence interval (C …
Impact of the day-30 screening strategy on the disease presentation and outcome of retinopathy of prematurity. The Indian twin cities retinopathy of prematurity report number 3.
Jalali S, Anand R, Rani PK, Balakrishnan D. Jalali S, et al. Among authors: anand r. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 May;62(5):610-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.118449. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24088643 Free PMC article.
Eyes that could be given treatment in group 2 were significantly less (P < 0.0005) than in group 1. The relative risk of poor outcome in group 2 was 3.83 times higher (95% confidence interval 2.75 -5.34) than in group 1. ...

Eyes that could be given treatment in group 2 were significantly less (P < 0.0005) than in group 1. The relative risk of poor outc