Uptake of Voluntary Occupational Health Care-Assessments of German Occupational Health Physicians and Employees

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159602.

Abstract

Workers' health surveillance is considered essential for employees' health and protection against hazardous working conditions. It is one part of occupational health care and thus one of four pillars of holistic workplace health management. In Germany, employers are obliged to provide mandatory and voluntary occupational health care (OHC) to employees, dependent on the defined occupational hazards. However, employees are not obliged to make use of voluntary OHC. No empirical information is available about the uptake of voluntary OHC by employees and the influencing factors in Germany. Thus, we carried out an explorative multi-perspective study with qualitative and quantitative elements to get insights from the view of occupational health physicians (OHPs) and employees. We conducted a survey among OHPs based on prior statements from two focus group discussions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect enablers and barriers regarding employee uptake of the offered voluntary OHC. We used extended qualitative methods among employees instead of an analogous survey. In total, 460 OHPs participated in the survey (response rate 29.1%), and 25 employees took part in interviews. Most of the employees had not heard the term voluntary OHC before, and only a few remembered respective occupational health care after explanatory request. In total, 78% of the OHPs assessed that employees always/mostly take up voluntary OHC. The most important attributed reason for non-uptake was that employees see no need for occupational health care when they feel healthy. The most important enabler for the perceived high uptake of voluntary OHC in the regression analysis was a positive attitude of the OHP toward voluntary OHC. While OHPs perceived that voluntary OHC was accepted by a majority of employees, this was not confirmed by the interviews with selected employees. This could indicate that the OHP respondents overestimated the amount of uptake. Since it became clear that employees are often unfamiliar with the terminology itself, we see a need for more and better information regarding the objectives and content of occupational health care to improve this important pillar of workplace health management.

Keywords: employees; interviews; multi-perspective study; occupational health care; occupational health physicians; predictors for uptake; survey; uptake of occupational health care; workers’ health surveillance; workplace health management.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Occupational Health Physicians*
  • Occupational Health Services*
  • Occupational Health*
  • Workplace

Grants and funding

The study was financed by the German Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs (grant number VKZ 110307). In addition, the institute´s own resources were used to finance the joint analysis of quantitative and qualitative data and the writing of the manuscript. The work of the Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Tübingen, is supported by an unrestricted grant of the Employers’ Association of the Metal and Electric Industry Baden-Württemberg (Südwestmetall). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis of data, interpretation of data and dissemination of findings.