Purpose/objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of dual-energy subtraction (DE) and conventional radiography (CR) for detecting pulmonary emphysema using computed tomography (CT) as a reference standard.
Methods and materials: Sixty-six patients (24 female, median age 73) were retrospectively included after obtaining lateral and posteroanterior chest X-rays with a dual-shot DE technique and chest CT within ±3 months. Two experienced radiologists first evaluated the standard CR images and, second, the bone-/soft tissue weighted DE images for the presence (yes/no), degree (1-4), and quadrant-based distribution of emphysema. CT was used as a reference standard. Inter-reader agreement was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity for the correct detection and localization of emphysema was calculated. Further degree of emphysema on CR and DE was correlated with results from CT. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: The mean interreader agreement was substantial for CR and moderate for DE (kCR = 0.611 vs. kDE = 0.433; respectively). Sensitivity, as well as specificity for the detection of emphysema, was comparable between CR and DE (sensitivityCR 96% and specificityCR 75% vs. sensitivityDE 91% and specificityDE 83%; p = 0.157). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity or specificity for emphysema localization between CR and DE (sensitivityCR 50% and specificityCR 100% vs. sensitivityDE 57% and specificityDE 100%; p = 0.157). There was a slightly better correlation with CT of emphysema grading in DE compared to CR (rDE = 0.75 vs. rCR = 0.68; p = 0.108); these differences were not statistically significant, however.
Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy for the detection, quantification, and localization of emphysema between CR and DE is comparable. Interreader agreement, however, is better with CR compared to DE.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; conventional radiography; diagnostic procedure; lung.