Depression prevalence using the HADS-D compared to SCID major depression classification: An individual participant data meta-analysis.
Brehaut E, Neupane D, Levis B, Wu Y, Sun Y, Krishnan A, He C, Bhandari PM, Negeri Z, Riehm KE, Rice DB, Azar M, Yan XW, Imran M, Chiovitti MJ, Saadat N, Cuijpers P, Ioannidis JPA, Markham S, Patten SB, Ziegelstein RC, Henry M, Ismail Z, Loiselle CG, Mitchell ND, Tonelli M, Boruff JT, Kloda LA, Beraldi A, Braeken APBM, Carter G, Clover K, Conroy RM, Cukor D, da Rocha E Silva CE, De Souza J, Downing MG, Feinstein A, Ferentinos PP, Fischer FH, Flint AJ, Fujimori M, Gallagher P, Goebel S, Jetté N, Julião M, Keller M, Kjærgaard M, Love AW, Löwe B, Martin-Santos R, Michopoulos I, Navines R, O'Rourke SJ, Öztürk A, Pintor L, Ponsford JL, Rooney AG, Sánchez-González R, Schwarzbold ML, Sharpe M, Simard S, Singer S, Stone J, Tung KY, Turner A, Walker J, Walterfang M, White J, Benedetti A, Thombs BD.
Brehaut E, et al.
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Dec;139:110256. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110256. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
J Psychosom Res. 2020.
PMID: 33069051
Pooled prevalence was 24.5% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 20.5%, 29.0%) for HADS-D 8, 10.7% (95% CI: 8.3%, 13.8%) for HADS-D 11, and 11.6% (95% CI: 9.2%, 14.6%) for SCID major depression. ...CONCLUSIONS: HADS-D 8 substantially overestimates depression preval …
Pooled prevalence was 24.5% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 20.5%, 29.0%) for HADS-D 8, 10.7% (95% CI: 8.3%, 13.8%) for HADS-D …