Current research seeking to relate between ambient water vapor deficit (D) and foliage conductance (gF) derives a canopy conductance (gW) from measured transpiration by inverting the coupled transpiration model to yield gW = m - n ln(D) where m and n are fitting parameters. In contrast, this paper demonstrates that the relation between coupled gW and D is gW = AP/D + B, where P is the barometric pressure, A is the radiative term, and B is the convective term coefficient of the Penman-Monteith equation. A and B are functions of gF and of meteorological parameters but are mathematically independent of D. Keeping A and B constant implies constancy of gF. With these premises, the derived gW is a hyperbolic function of D resembling the logarithmic expression, in contradiction with the pre-set constancy of gF. Calculations with random inputs that ensure independence between gF and D reproduce published experimental scatter plots that display a dependence between gW and D in contradiction with the premises. For this reason, the dependence of gW on D is a computational artifact unrelated to any real effect of ambient humidity on stomatal aperture and closure. Data collected in a maize field confirm the inadequacy of the logarithmic function to quantify the relation between canopy conductance and vapor pressure deficit.
Keywords: Air humidity; Coupling; Stomata; Transpiration.