Comparison of Aerobic Capacity Changes as a Result of a Polarized or Block Training Program among Trained Mountain Bike Cyclists

This study compared the effectiveness of a block training program and a polarized training program in developing aerobic capacity in twenty trained mountain bike cyclists. The cyclists were divided into two groups: the block training program group (BT) and the polarized training program group (PT). The experiment lasted 8 weeks. During the experiment, the BT group alternated between 17-day blocks consisting of dominant low-intensity training (LIT) and 11-day blocks consisting of sprint interval training (SIT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), while the PT group performed SIT, HIIT, and LIT simultaneously. Before and after the experiment, the cyclists performed incremental tests during which maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max), maximal aerobic power (Pmax), power achieved at the first ventilatory threshold (P_VT1), and at the second ventilatory threshold (P_VT2) were measured. VO₂max increased in BT group (from 3.75 ± 0.67 to 4.00 ± 0.75 L∙min^-1) and PT group (from 3.66 ± 0.73 to 4.20 ± 0.89 L∙min^-1). In addition, Pmax, P_VT1, and P_VT2 increased in both groups to a similar extent. In conclusion, the polarized training program was more effective in developing the VO₂max compared to the block program. In terms of developing other parameters characterizing the cyclists' aerobic capacity, the block and polarized program induced similar results.